Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Base function: Possibility to give visits a type like "standard", "deleted", "bot" etc. #9205

Closed
hpvd opened this issue Nov 12, 2015 · 3 comments
Labels
duplicate For issues that already existed in our issue tracker and were reported previously.

Comments

@hpvd
Copy link

hpvd commented Nov 12, 2015

Possibility to give visits a "type" like:

  • "standard"
  • "deleted"
  • "bot"
    -...

With this one can keep every visit always in database but can
easily decide (filter) for each type of visit being

  • visible
  • considered within statistic

This should be the better, more general way to achieve all advantages from
#9184

This is the basic for

  1. Delete function and being able to have an "undo function" (Let me delete Visitors from Visitor Log (and undo it) #3385 and Vistor-Log-Tool: 1. step: general setup + actions of type delete #9204)
    With this the action "deleting" is only a change of type from standard to deleted
    And undo is simply changing type from "deleted" back to "standard".
  2. Simplifying bot tracking Simplify bots tracking, bot ignoring and switching between both #9067
    every bot got the "type" "bot"
@hpvd hpvd changed the title Possibility to mark visits as deleted Possibility to give visits a type like "standard", "deleted", "bot" etc. Nov 12, 2015
@hpvd hpvd changed the title Possibility to give visits a type like "standard", "deleted", "bot" etc. Base function: Possibility to give visits a type like "standard", "deleted", "bot" etc. Nov 12, 2015
@hpvd
Copy link
Author

hpvd commented Nov 12, 2015

to making undo easily possible one could e.g store a second type for each visit "was before type"
so one can easily revert any change by looking into this visit field

@hpvd
Copy link
Author

hpvd commented Nov 13, 2015

from technical pov this could be somehow related to #8161

@mattab
Copy link
Member

mattab commented Nov 18, 2015

Thanks for suggestion @hpvd - I think it duplicates #9184 - feel free to post comment there if needed

@mattab mattab closed this as completed Nov 18, 2015
@mattab mattab added the duplicate For issues that already existed in our issue tracker and were reported previously. label Nov 18, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
duplicate For issues that already existed in our issue tracker and were reported previously.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants