Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Number of Page views different in table view (Pages) and transitions popup #9024

Open
HTWGkonstanz opened this issue Oct 16, 2015 · 7 comments
Labels
Bug For errors / faults / flaws / inconsistencies etc.

Comments

@HTWGkonstanz
Copy link

Pageviews totally differ from the "standard" table view to the "transitions" view regardless which date range is picked or wether you look at pages or page titles.

Sometime the number in the "transisionts" view is the higher one, most of the time the number in den "table" view is the higher one, some numbers are the same. Some numbers only differ by 1-2, some numbers differ by 1.000 - it doesn´t make any sense.

I thought, they should be the same...what aspect am I missing here?

r669dvhufa

tmvck9y4mc

@mattab
Copy link
Member

mattab commented Nov 26, 2015

Hi @HTWGkonstanz

Thanks for the report, this is surprising indeed: it should be the same, because both views should use the same API and data source.

Can you reproduce this issue on https://demo.piwik.org ? please paste the links and we will investigate

@mattab mattab added the Bug For errors / faults / flaws / inconsistencies etc. label Nov 26, 2015
@mattab mattab added this to the Short term milestone Nov 26, 2015
@HTWGkonstanz
Copy link
Author

Yes, I can replicate the bug – but the differences between the numbers are much smaller (differences of 10 views etc.)

For example:
Pages
In year 2015 the page „index“ has 36.203 page views.
If you open “Transitions” for this pages, it shows 36.185 page views.

https://demo.piwik.org/index.php?module=CoreHome https://demo.piwik.org/index.php?module=CoreHome&action=index&idSite=7&period=year&date=2015-11-26#?module=Actions&action=menuGetPageUrls&idSite=7&period=year&date=2015-11-26 &action=index&idSite=7&period=year&date=2015-11-26#?module=Actions&action=menuGetPageUrls&idSite=7&period=year&date=2015-11-26

On our website we had much more “extreme” differences, where one number was only 50% of the other number.

@sgiehl
Copy link
Member

sgiehl commented Nov 27, 2015

Guess we need to have a closer look at the way the transitions are calculating their data.
It seems to be calculated on the given URL. Which might not always be correct.

Btw. it is also possible to display data for invalid URLs. I guess there shouldn't be data at all, but instead some strange data is displayed.... See https://demo.piwik.org/index.php?module=CoreHome&action=index&idSite=7&period=year&date=2015-11-26#?module=Actions&action=menuGetPageUrls&idSite=7&period=year&date=2015-11-26&popover=RowAction$3ATransitions$3Aurl$3A$2FinvalidUr12345

@mgonera
Copy link

mgonera commented Feb 8, 2017

Is anyone caring about this in 2017? :) I confirmed that current 3.0 demo on piwik.org also has this issue. It's enough to run transitions on monthly data "index" page.

@sebastianpiskorski
Copy link
Contributor

sebastianpiskorski commented Mar 8, 2017

I've checked this one on large dataset and discrepancies still occurs.

After short investigation, I've some suspicions that it might be related to how unique visitors are calculated.

Report I've been investigating: "Pages Following a Site Search"

@rogogon
Copy link

rogogon commented May 23, 2017

hi ;) I want to confirm that this bug is still occurring. Are you planning to fix it?

@sgiehl
Copy link
Member

sgiehl commented May 23, 2017

@rogogon It's currently not planned to work on this issue. A Pull Request would be very welcome. Or if you would like to sponsor this fix/change feel free to contact the Piwik team. Otherwise it might take some time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug For errors / faults / flaws / inconsistencies etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants