Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Piwik upcoming requirements statement taking into account LTS/post-LTS software req's #8742

Closed
MagicFab opened this issue Sep 9, 2015 · 2 comments
Labels
c: Website matomo.org For issues related to our matomo.org website. not-in-changelog For issues or pull requests that should not be included in our release changelog on matomo.org.

Comments

@MagicFab
Copy link

MagicFab commented Sep 9, 2015

Related: #8156, #8701

Piwik requirements should be updated to clearly indicate which software versions will remain supported / which will be required once Piwik 3 comes out and Piwik 2.x acquires LTS status.

@mattab mattab added the c: Website matomo.org For issues related to our matomo.org website. label Sep 20, 2015
@mattab mattab added this to the 3.0.0 milestone Sep 20, 2015
@mattab mattab modified the milestones: 3.0.0, 2.16.x Feb 8, 2016
@mattab mattab modified the milestones: 3.0.0, 2.16.x (LTS) Apr 1, 2016
@mattab
Copy link
Member

mattab commented Nov 27, 2020

Thanks for the feedback @MagicFab
Published in https://matomo.org/blog/2016/01/announcing-long-term-support-in-matomo-the-analytics-platform-for-your-mission-critical-projects/

Quickly mentioned in https://matomo.org/faq/new-to-piwik/faq_18925/ as well

@mattab mattab closed this as completed Nov 27, 2020
@mattab mattab added the not-in-changelog For issues or pull requests that should not be included in our release changelog on matomo.org. label Nov 27, 2020
@MagicFab
Copy link
Author

Merci, Matt + team - glad to see LTS is still a thing !

However, its mention is still missing from the requirements link this aimed for initially. Most importantly, there isn't any mention of LTS support at the main download/install page new users are directed to when first visiting matomo.org :

https://matomo.org/docs/installation/

I suppose more advocacy for LTS awareness is in order and would help but more direct internal links to LTS information from top pages is what this was initially about.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c: Website matomo.org For issues related to our matomo.org website. not-in-changelog For issues or pull requests that should not be included in our release changelog on matomo.org.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants