Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Overlay improvements #8431

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jul 27, 2015
Merged

Overlay improvements #8431

merged 2 commits into from Jul 27, 2015

Conversation

sgiehl
Copy link
Member

@sgiehl sgiehl commented Jul 25, 2015

fixes #8353 and #8352

Overlay sidebar will now look like this:

image

@sgiehl sgiehl added Pull Request WIP Indicates the current pull request is still work in progress and not ready yet for a review. Needs Review PRs that need a code review and removed Pull Request WIP Indicates the current pull request is still work in progress and not ready yet for a review. labels Jul 25, 2015
@sgiehl sgiehl added this to the 2.15.0 milestone Jul 26, 2015
tsteur added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2015
@tsteur
Merge pull request #8431 from piwik/overlay_improvements
c64818e 
Overlay improvements
@tsteur tsteur merged commit c64818e into master Jul 27, 2015
@tsteur tsteur deleted the overlay_improvements branch July 27, 2015 05:38
@tsteur
Copy link
Member

tsteur commented Jul 27, 2015

The open segmented visitor log needs a little padding right, will have a quick look see http://builds-artifacts.piwik.org/ui-tests.overlay_improvements/14428.7/Overlay_loaded

tsteur added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2015
@tsteur
refs #8431 added little padding right to the segment links and others…
ca77eb7 
… in overlay screen
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Needs Review PRs that need a code review
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.15.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@sgiehl @tsteur