Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Incorrect domain age reported #5322

Closed
anonymous-matomo-user opened this issue Jun 9, 2014 · 4 comments
Closed

Incorrect domain age reported #5322

anonymous-matomo-user opened this issue Jun 9, 2014 · 4 comments
Assignees
@mattab
Labels
Bug For errors / faults / flaws / inconsistencies etc.
Milestone
2.4.0

Comments

@anonymous-matomo-user
Copy link

Using Piwik 2.4.0-b5.

The Domain Age seems to be reported incorrectly. On a domain that is >1 year old Piwik reports it is 23 days old.

How do you get the Domain Age data?
@mattab
Copy link
Member

mattab commented Jun 11, 2014

You can see the code here: https://github.com/piwik/piwik/blob/master/plugins/SEO/RankChecker.php#L141-177

we use archive.org, or whois. If you find the bug or even can do a pull request, this would be nice!

If not, what is your domain name that has wrong age?

@anonymous-matomo-user
Copy link
Author

The whois data I have seen for the domain is

created: 2013-03-11
modified: 2014-02-14
expires: 2015-03-11

None of those dates can give 23 days even if the year is wrong as far as I can see.

I'll email the domain to you.

@mattab
Copy link
Member

mattab commented Jun 20, 2014

In 4791c84: fixes #5322 whois records can also read "created: $datetime"

@anonymous-matomo-user
Copy link
Author

Great - I can confirm that now works in b7. Thanks.

@anonymous-matomo-user anonymous-matomo-user added this to the 2.4.0 - Piwik 2.4.0 milestone Jul 8, 2014
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mattab mattab

Labels
Bug For errors / faults / flaws / inconsistencies etc.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.4.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mattab @anonymous-matomo-user