Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Archiving performance for thousands of websites often without traffic #4940

Closed
mattab opened this issue Apr 2, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed
Labels
c: Performance For when we could improve the performance / speed of Matomo. duplicate For issues that already existed in our issue tracker and were reported previously. Task Indicates an issue is neither a feature nor a bug and it's purely a "technical" change.
Milestone

Comments

@mattab
Copy link
Member

mattab commented Apr 2, 2014

The goal is to avoid re-processing the period archive (which is slow as we select all sub-periods and sum and write the data).

To avoid re-processing we may update the existing archive for this period, and update date2 column to today.

This way we avoid lots of writing and also having to delete these outdated "current period" archives.

@mattab mattab added this to the 2.x - The Great Piwik 2.x Backlog milestone Jul 8, 2014
@mattab mattab removed the P: normal label Aug 3, 2014
@mattab
Copy link
Member Author

mattab commented Dec 1, 2014

see also #5922

@mattab mattab added the duplicate For issues that already existed in our issue tracker and were reported previously. label Dec 6, 2014
@mattab
Copy link
Member Author

mattab commented Dec 6, 2014

tracked in #5922

@mattab mattab closed this as completed Dec 6, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c: Performance For when we could improve the performance / speed of Matomo. duplicate For issues that already existed in our issue tracker and were reported previously. Task Indicates an issue is neither a feature nor a bug and it's purely a "technical" change.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant