Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Archiving: consider not hashing segments in the archive id string #4916

Closed
diosmosis opened this issue Mar 27, 2014 · 0 comments
Closed

Archiving: consider not hashing segments in the archive id string #4916

diosmosis opened this issue Mar 27, 2014 · 0 comments
Labels
Task Indicates an issue is neither a feature nor a bug and it's purely a "technical" change. wontfix If you can reproduce this issue, please reopen the issue or create a new one describing it.
Milestone
Long term

Comments

@diosmosis
Copy link
Member

The VisitFrequency API backwards compatibility issues have shown that it can be desirable to get a segment from an archive DB entry. Since segments are hashed before their archives are stored, this is currently impossible. An alternative to hashing could potentially be small string compression, see: https://github.com/antirez/smaz/tree/master
@diosmosis diosmosis added this to the Future releases milestone Jul 8, 2014
@mattab mattab modified the milestones: Long term, Mid term Dec 23, 2015
@mattab mattab closed this as completed Jul 1, 2016
@mattab mattab added the wontfix If you can reproduce this issue, please reopen the issue or create a new one describing it. label Jul 1, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Task Indicates an issue is neither a feature nor a bug and it's purely a "technical" change. wontfix If you can reproduce this issue, please reopen the issue or create a new one describing it.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Long term
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@diosmosis @mattab