Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Analyse and document development of site quality over time #4137

Closed
hpvd opened this issue Sep 7, 2013 · 1 comment
Closed

Analyse and document development of site quality over time #4137

hpvd opened this issue Sep 7, 2013 · 1 comment
Labels
Enhancement For new feature suggestions that enhance Matomo's capabilities or add a new report, new API etc. worksforme The issue cannot be reproduced and things work as intended.

Comments

@hpvd
Copy link

hpvd commented Sep 7, 2013

Everyone wants to improve his/her web page.

So why not making a good overview possible directly where the most of the data

already is?
directly in piwik!

Maybe we have to use a part of the data the other way around as we do it at this

time...

But what are the "quality factors"?

We could split it in 4 groups:

the most important:

  1. Quality from the visitor point of view:
  • how long does he/she stay on a page?
  • does he come back?
  • does he leave the website (to another domain) without following an outgoing link

from our page?

  1. from the technical site (its the base to improve visitor satisfaction)
  • pagespeed (time)
  • validation errors of css, htm, js
    (do not know how to recevie it in best way for each page: with a special manual check

button?)

  1. factors from external (for posibility for futher changes of)
  1. content
    most complex because we have to crawl the site (=> second step?)

of course we could not analyse the quality of the content,
but we could analyze single content elemets (CE) by
three checks:

  • available
  • good form (eg number of meta keywords, lenght of meta description...)
  • unique (not the same on any other page of our website
    (<= often happens by copying sites as "starting point" of a new page..)

what content elements would be interesting to check:

  • standard meta (title, keywords, description..)
  • opengraph meta elements
  • twitter meta elements
  • headlines (h1..h6)
  • images
  • ...
@mattab
Copy link
Member

mattab commented Sep 7, 2013

Thanks for the suggestion. Maybe create a new thread in the Feature requests forum at: http://forum.piwik.org/list.php?3 so other users can show their interest!

This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement For new feature suggestions that enhance Matomo's capabilities or add a new report, new API etc. worksforme The issue cannot be reproduced and things work as intended.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants