Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Wrong translations for city names #3508

Closed
anonymous-matomo-user opened this issue Nov 2, 2012 · 3 comments
Closed

Wrong translations for city names #3508

anonymous-matomo-user opened this issue Nov 2, 2012 · 3 comments
Labels
Bug For errors / faults / flaws / inconsistencies etc. worksforme The issue cannot be reproduced and things work as intended.
Milestone
1.9.2

Comments

@anonymous-matomo-user
Copy link

I noticed in the demo that some cities are misspelled. Please look at the screenshot below.

Wrong: "Hanover"
Correct: "Hannover".

Not a heavy bug, just for issue documentation.
@anonymous-matomo-user
Copy link
Author

Attachment:
piwik.jpg

@halfdan
Copy link
Member

halfdan commented Nov 3, 2012

"Hanover" is perfectly fine.

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=Hanover&hl=en&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=39.184175,56.513672&t=h&hnear=Hanover,+Lower+Saxony,+Germany&z=11

This is also not a problem with Piwik, since City data is directly coming from the GeoIP City database and is not translated by Piwik (it would be hard to maintain a list of all cities including their translations for all languages).

@sgiehl
Copy link
Member

sgiehl commented Nov 3, 2012

I agree. Providing translations for cities and regions isn't really maintainable.

@anonymous-matomo-user anonymous-matomo-user added this to the 1.9.2 - Piwik 1.9.2 milestone Jul 8, 2014
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Bug For errors / faults / flaws / inconsistencies etc. worksforme The issue cannot be reproduced and things work as intended.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.9.2
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@halfdan @mattab @sgiehl @anonymous-matomo-user