Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Time range period acts differently when comparing segments #17316

Open
Chardonneaur opened this issue Mar 8, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Time range period acts differently when comparing segments #17316

Chardonneaur opened this issue Mar 8, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
Enhancement For new feature suggestions that enhance Matomo's capabilities or add a new report, new API etc.
Milestone
For Prioritization

Comments

@Chardonneaur
Copy link

When we use the segment comparison feature, it is then not possible to have a month period/week time range. It sticks automatically to a day period.

Expected Behavior

When the segment comparison feature is used it should respect the time period selected. For example if I select March 2021, only months should be plotted on the graph, not days of the month.
@Chardonneaur Chardonneaur added the Potential Bug Something that might be a bug, but needs validation and confirmation it can be reproduced. label Mar 8, 2021
@diosmosis
Copy link
Member

I believe this is by design, to mimic the GA comparison feature, so a change to show the previous N periods as normal would be an enhancement.

cc @mattab

@diosmosis diosmosis added Enhancement For new feature suggestions that enhance Matomo's capabilities or add a new report, new API etc. and removed Potential Bug Something that might be a bug, but needs validation and confirmation it can be reproduced. labels Mar 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Enhancement For new feature suggestions that enhance Matomo's capabilities or add a new report, new API etc.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
For Prioritization
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@diosmosis @Chardonneaur @innocraft-automation