Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update tag manager reference which removes duplicate index #15695

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 16, 2020
Merged

Update tag manager reference which removes duplicate index #15695

merged 1 commit into from Mar 16, 2020

Conversation

tsteur
Copy link
Member

@tsteur tsteur commented Mar 16, 2020 •
edited

need to wait for tests to pass

@tsteur tsteur added the not-in-changelog For issues or pull requests that should not be included in our release changelog on matomo.org. label Mar 16, 2020
@tsteur tsteur added this to the 3.13.4 milestone Mar 16, 2020
@tsteur tsteur added the Needs Review PRs that need a code review label Mar 16, 2020
@sgiehl
Copy link
Member

sgiehl commented Mar 16, 2020

failing tests seem to be unrelated

@sgiehl sgiehl merged commit 7c1d705 into 3.x-dev Mar 16, 2020
@sgiehl sgiehl deleted the updatetagm branch March 16, 2020 11:40
jonasgrilleres pushed a commit to 1024pix/pix-analytics that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2020
@tsteur @jonasgrilleres
Update tag manager reference removing duplicate index (matomo-org#15695)
9a911eb
jbuget pushed a commit to 1024pix/pix-analytics that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2020
@tsteur @jbuget
Update tag manager reference removing duplicate index (matomo-org#15695)
14c810e
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Needs Review PRs that need a code review not-in-changelog For issues or pull requests that should not be included in our release changelog on matomo.org.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.13.4
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@tsteur @sgiehl