Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes a couple segment handling regressions in the UI #15110

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Nov 8, 2019

Conversation

diosmosis
Copy link
Member

FIxes #15080

Changes:

@diosmosis diosmosis added the Needs Review PRs that need a code review label Nov 5, 2019
@diosmosis diosmosis added this to the 3.13.0 milestone Nov 5, 2019
@tsteur
Copy link
Member

tsteur commented Nov 5, 2019

@diosmosis there are quite a few system tests failing: https://travis-ci.org/matomo-org/matomo/jobs/607490406#L849

Not sure this is expected?

@diosmosis
Copy link
Member Author

Tried looking for the cause of the regressions, but couldn't figure out the other encoding issue so I ended up solving this a different way.

@tsteur
Copy link
Member

tsteur commented Nov 6, 2019

@diosmosis looks good. There's a failing system tests still though https://travis-ci.org/matomo-org/matomo/jobs/607961524#L810 probably from the fixture change in the PR. Not sure that fixture change is still needed or expected? Do you reckon it's possible to add a test for the case it fixes?

@diosmosis
Copy link
Member Author

diosmosis commented Nov 6, 2019

Shouldn't be a fixture change here, that's probably something that happens locally on os x. Maybe. There's a change to the test file in this PR I'll just remove.

@tsteur
Copy link
Member

tsteur commented Nov 6, 2019

@diosmosis if a test can be added for this that be great, otherwise feel free to merge.

@diosmosis diosmosis merged commit d5c9010 into 3.x-dev Nov 8, 2019
@diosmosis diosmosis deleted the 15080-segment-regressions branch November 8, 2019 02:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs Review PRs that need a code review
Projects
None yet
2 participants