Agreed with the renaming points above 👍

More feedback:

Can we allow even to delete reports after 2 or even 1 month instead of having to keep them for at least 3 which is maybe a bit random? Like why is it 3? I presume 2 might work as well?

it's a bit random but the idea is to prevent people from deleting everything, as no one ever wanted to delete all reports less than 3 months old (it's wasn't a use case so far). Deleting all data removes a lot of value from Matomo. Sometimes users need to reset their data (and would like to delete it all once), but i've not heard so far of users wanting to delete such recent data.
But we can change the 3 months to 1 month (no strong preference).

The sentence seems bit random and hard to understand (still not quite sure what the sentence is trying to say) If you have not enabled "Regularly delete old visitor logs from the database", old reports will be recreated automatically when requested

It was trying to say "if you delete old reports, they may be re-processed again from your RAW data when you request them". This sentence can be removed I think.

If you have enabled "Regularly delete old visitor logs from the database", the data will be permanently lost. The sentence is also a bit hard to understand.

It's trying to say that if you have also enabled "Regularly delete old raw data from the database", then the reports data you're deleting will be permanently lost. Whereas if you keep the old raw data, then you can manage to re-process the reports data that is being deleted.

@tsteur was this fixed completely in #13464?

Yes 👍