Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Multiple Matomo app servers using common database #12697

Open
cthornburg1 opened this issue Apr 5, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Multiple Matomo app servers using common database #12697

cthornburg1 opened this issue Apr 5, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
Enhancement For new feature suggestions that enhance Matomo's capabilities or add a new report, new API etc.
Milestone
For Prioritization

Comments

@cthornburg1
Copy link

Can multiple Matomo(Piwik) app servers share a common database to avoid having to update the JavaScript on 100+ websites and a DNS redirect?

Current configuration is:

  • A Matomo(Piwik) app server that is on premise equipment with a SQL Server database
  • A Matomo(Piwik) app server in one Virtual Private Cloud
  • A SQL Server in another Virtual Private Cloud.

The Matomo app server on the cloud does not track anything yet.

With the Matomo servers on the same version, the on premise database can be copied to the cloud database. The plan is to update the JavaScript on the 100+ websites over time to use the Cloud Matomo app server.

Can the on premise Matomo server and the cloud Matomo server use the same cloud SQL Server database? Are there any any special setup or configuration changes needed?
@Findus23 Findus23 added the Enhancement For new feature suggestions that enhance Matomo's capabilities or add a new report, new API etc. label May 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Enhancement For new feature suggestions that enhance Matomo's capabilities or add a new report, new API etc.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
For Prioritization
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@Findus23 @cthornburg1 @innocraft-automation