Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

During log import, many invalid lines with invalid generation time #12351

Closed
nicosomb opened this issue Dec 12, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

During log import, many invalid lines with invalid generation time #12351

nicosomb opened this issue Dec 12, 2017 · 4 comments
Labels
answered For when a question was asked and we referred to forum or answered it.

Comments

@nicosomb
Copy link

Hello piwik team.

Thank you for your application.
Since I updated my piwik instance to the 3.2.0 (and now to the 3.2.1), I've got many warnings like this one:

2017-12-12 11:00:40,343: [DEBUG] Invalid line detected (invalid generation time): 42.XXX.XX.XX - - [12/Dec/2017:06:26:31 +0100] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 301 178 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:40.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/40.1"

Could you explain me what it is please?

In fact, I'm not sure that it appeared only with the 3.2.x, but it's the first time that I see these warnings.
@sgiehl
Copy link
Member

sgiehl commented Dec 12, 2017

You can ignore those "errors" about invalid generation time. We already fixed that in matomo-org/matomo-log-analytics#198

@sgiehl sgiehl closed this as completed Dec 12, 2017
@sgiehl sgiehl added the answered For when a question was asked and we referred to forum or answered it. label Dec 12, 2017
@nicosomb
Copy link
Author

Thank you @sgiehl.
Just a little question (no need to open a new issue for that I think). Could you tell me if piwik changed something in 3.2.x to count analytics via the logs importer?
Because my analytics crashed when I upgraded to 3.2.x and I don't know if it comes from Piwik or not (the last peak is the day of my update)

capture d ecran 2017-12-12 a 11 42 25

@sgiehl
Copy link
Member

sgiehl commented Dec 12, 2017

actually it shouldn't have changed anything. From which version did you upgrade? Which kind of log files are you analyzing? Is it normal website traffic or something special?

@nicosomb
Copy link
Author

It's a normal website (with restricted access, available only for users, but clients number don't change).
I upgraded from the previous minor release.
I analyze nginx access log.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
answered For when a question was asked and we referred to forum or answered it.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@nicosomb @sgiehl