Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Added new events for scheduled tasks #11718

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 18, 2017
Merged

Added new events for scheduled tasks #11718

merged 1 commit into from May 18, 2017

Conversation

tsteur
Copy link
Member

@tsteur tsteur commented May 18, 2017

Added new events so other plugins can disable tasks or customize behaviour.

The execute events are similar to our Request.dispatch and Request.dispatch.end event / API.Request.dispatch and API.Request.dispatch.end events.

@tsteur tsteur added c: Platform For Matomo platform changes that aren't impacting any of our APIs but improve the core itself. Enhancement For new feature suggestions that enhance Matomo's capabilities or add a new report, new API etc. labels May 18, 2017
@tsteur tsteur added this to the 3.0.5 milestone May 18, 2017
sgiehl
sgiehl approved these changes May 18, 2017
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@sgiehl sgiehl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM :shipit:

@tsteur tsteur merged commit 86d6509 into 3.x-dev May 18, 2017
@tsteur tsteur deleted the tasksrunnerevent branch May 18, 2017 21:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sgiehl sgiehl sgiehl approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
c: Platform For Matomo platform changes that aren't impacting any of our APIs but improve the core itself. Enhancement For new feature suggestions that enhance Matomo's capabilities or add a new report, new API etc.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.1.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@tsteur @sgiehl