You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We recently migrated to AWS and in both of our instances of Piwik 2.16.5 production and 3.0.2 staging we are now seeing User Ids being counted as 3 unique visitors. We are running PHP 7.x and MySQL 5.7
setUserId is being used, however the Visitor Id is still taking precedence over the User Id. A single user (one unique User Id) is being counted three separate times because the visitor id has changed three times. Every time the visitor id changes, that user is being counted as a new user. A segment for a particular User Id will return a single user, but will be counted as three unique visitors.
any thoughts, Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Clarification, we are tracking over 100+ sites and each site Piwik assigns a different Visitor ID for the same User ID. We did not see this issue with Piwik 2.11. Is there a user table per site and/or overall global table? Will we need to wait for the resolution of #11411 or should we try tracking multiple domain names as discussed in the thread below?
Hi @bflanagan78
Could you please create a new issue and paste there a small HTML code that can be used to reproduce a problem, as well as "We got XYZ but expected ABC". Thanks
Hi,
We recently migrated to AWS and in both of our instances of Piwik 2.16.5 production and 3.0.2 staging we are now seeing User Ids being counted as 3 unique visitors. We are running PHP 7.x and MySQL 5.7
setUserId is being used, however the Visitor Id is still taking precedence over the User Id. A single user (one unique User Id) is being counted three separate times because the visitor id has changed three times. Every time the visitor id changes, that user is being counted as a new user. A segment for a particular User Id will return a single user, but will be counted as three unique visitors.
any thoughts, Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: