@robocoder opened this Issue on December 27th 2009 Contributor

I think this is another side effect of #708. Do we want to offer a migration script or not?


@anonymous-matomo-user commented on January 5th 2010
@mattab commented on January 5th 2010 Member

This is indeed a bug, but I think it's an acceptable one, a bit unfortunate but providing a migration script would be too costly (require to reprocess all previous archives). The current behaviour will not change in the future and is the correct one. Won't fix.

This Issue was closed on January 5th 2010
Powered by GitHub Issue Mirror