Aggregate 500 events in a sub-table instead of 100 #12741
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
100 is too limited when it comes especially to tracking event names by event action or event category. 500 will cover a lot more use cases without compromising performance.
sgiehl
approved these changes
Apr 20, 2018
InfinityVoid
pushed a commit
to InfinityVoid/matomo
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2018
100 is too limited when it comes especially to tracking event names by event action or event category. 500 will cover a lot more use cases without compromising performance.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
100 is too limited when it comes especially to tracking event names by event action or event category. 500 will cover a lot more use cases without compromising performance.