New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
mentioning visit numbers #12516
Comments
@henkvdbeukel |
No Lukas, I doubted that already. I probably misunderstood how to add attachments. But here that are.
Kind regards, Henk
Henk W. Van den Beukel
Markiezaat 35, 5262 RA VUGHT
Tel 073 - 6563380 GSM 06 - 21 5111 21
Mail henkvdbeukel@olyphant.nl
Website www.lugtigheid.org
… Op 29 jan. 2018, om 08:45 heeft Lukas Winkler ***@***.***> het volgende geschreven:
@henkvdbeukel <https://github.com/henkvdbeukel>
I am not sure those are the correct images...
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#12516 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AiPchcoJ1D_p3nsUdcvz_omYaJolgy50ks5tPXcZgaJpZM4Rv6g2>.
|
@henkvdbeukel There are still no images. Where are you looking for those numbers? |
I don’t understand why Thomas. In my 2nd mail yesterday the pictures were visible.
I now made a new attachment in pdf in which I try to explain again.
In the left column I show the 4 visits (=bezoeken) yesterday (28/1) of 94.212.94.39, which weren’t numbered/counted yesterday.
Today I saw (see right above) still one visit of 28/1 at 22:19:14 and also a visit today (29/1) of the same IP address.
However, now it is counted as a 5th visit and previous ones in the past, but the 4 visits of yesterday are not mentioned/counted at all?!?
Is that correct or a bug or do I interpret these facts wrong?
Regards, Henk
Henk W. Van den Beukel
Markiezaat 35, 5262 RA VUGHT
Tel 073 - 6563380 GSM 06 - 21 5111 21
Mail henkvdbeukel@olyphant.nl
Website www.lugtigheid.org
… Op 29 jan. 2018, om 19:55 heeft Thomas Steur ***@***.***> het volgende geschreven:
@henkvdbeukel <https://github.com/henkvdbeukel> There are still no images. Where are you looking for those numbers?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#12516 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AiPchXQ03FybZTiddFUJrSjDz3qmTEkKks5tPhQ6gaJpZM4Rv6g2>.
|
Hi, github doesn’t allow attachments via email. |
. . . i hope this worked |
It seems like it created a different visitor for that day. There could be valid reasons for this such as the user used a different Mac for that day or the user activated a browser plugin just for one day or so. Can you find the visitor on Jan 28th for this IP? Maybe this helps to find out why it used a different visitor for that day. BTW: It would be good to maybe hide the IPs in images? |
Unfortunately I don’t know who that visitor was Thomas.
I would, by the way, very much like it if it technically would become possible some time to know which persons are behind those IP-addresses allowing to contact them
Sorry, I didn’t realise those IP-addresses might be publicly visible. Or is that not the case, and is it only within your Help-team?
Kind regards, Henk
Henk W. Van den Beukel
Markiezaat 35, 5262 RA VUGHT
Tel 073 - 6563380 GSM 06 - 21 5111 21
Mail henkvdbeukel@olyphant.nl
Website www.lugtigheid.org
… Op 30 jan. 2018, om 19:49 heeft Thomas Steur ***@***.***> het volgende geschreven:
It seems like it created a different visitor for that day. There could be valid reasons for this such as the user used a different Mac for that day or the user activated a browser plugin just for one day or so.
Can you find the visitor on Jan 28th for this IP? Maybe this helps to find out why it used a different visitor for that day.
BTW: It would be good to maybe hide the IPs in images?
—
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#12516 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AiPchW9NJW3A1mX8uN_iJcCTNzi9XQwnks5tP2Q8gaJpZM4Rv6g2>.
|
. . . strange!
Today that same visitor visited the site 2 times at 19:46:43 and 20:24:38 and while the visit number was yesterday #7 it showed now #6 (?!?)
How is that possible?
Henk
Henk W. Van den Beukel
Markiezaat 35, 5262 RA VUGHT
Tel 073 - 6563380 GSM 06 - 21 5111 21
Mail henkvdbeukel@olyphant.nl
Website www.lugtigheid.org
… Op 30 jan. 2018, om 23:23 heeft Henk van den Beukel ***@***.***> het volgende geschreven:
Unfortunately I don’t know who that visitor was Thomas.
I would, by the way, very much like it if it technically would become possible some time to know which persons are behind those IP-addresses allowing to contact them
Sorry, I didn’t realise those IP-addresses might be publicly visible. Or is that not the case, and is it only within your Help-team?
Kind regards, Henk
Henk W. Van den Beukel
Markiezaat 35, 5262 RA VUGHT
Tel 073 - 6563380 GSM 06 - 21 5111 21
Mail ***@***.*** ***@***.***>
Website www.lugtigheid.org <http://www.lugtigheid.org/>
> Op 30 jan. 2018, om 19:49 heeft Thomas Steur ***@***.*** ***@***.***>> het volgende geschreven:
>
> It seems like it created a different visitor for that day. There could be valid reasons for this such as the user used a different Mac for that day or the user activated a browser plugin just for one day or so.
>
> Can you find the visitor on Jan 28th for this IP? Maybe this helps to find out why it used a different visitor for that day.
>
> BTW: It would be good to maybe hide the IPs in images?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#12516 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AiPchW9NJW3A1mX8uN_iJcCTNzi9XQwnks5tP2Q8gaJpZM4Rv6g2>.
>
|
As this issue is already over 4 years old and there has been no more activity, I'll close it now. |
I am used to seeing the number of times repeating visitors (bezoekers)have visited the site.
Now I saw a visitor (IP 94.212.94.39) who visted my site 4 times, but no number of visits (bezoeken) was mentioned.
Is that correct or a bug?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: